Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

610 So. 2d 731

Bayliff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-12-30

Decided 1992-12-30

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this case the jury found defendant guilty of all charges except Count III, depriving an officer of his means of protection. At sentencing, the trial court nevertheless imposed a concurrent sentence for this offense. The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in so doing.

¶2We reverse the sentence and remand, therefore, with instructions to correct this obvious oversight. We affirm on all other issues.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur.
/610/so2d/731 · .json · Public domain