¶1Dailey has challenged his habitual offender sentence on several grounds, none of which has merit. See Massey v. State, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992); Baxter v. State, 599 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We do, however, remand for the trial court to strike special condition of probation number six, which was inappropriately imposed without oral pronouncement. Zachary v. State, 559 So.2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). All costs except those mandated by sections 960.20 and 943.25(3),. Florida Statutes, are stricken.
610 So. 2d 738
Dailey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 13, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-01-13
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1993
1 state decisions
Relies on 609 So. 2d 598 - Massey v. State · 599 So. 2d 721 - Baxter v. State · 559 So. 2d 105 - Zachary v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-01-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →