Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 A2D 67 - State v. Lemay

State v. Lemay’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2026

8 state decisions

501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Di Bella v. United States · State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n · Department of Human Services v. Lowatchie · In Re Erica B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that appeals, in order to be cognizable, must be from a final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.