Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 F.2d 1 - Marshall v. Commonwealth Aquarium

Marshall v. Commonwealth Aquarium’s Empirical Analysis

611 F.2d 1 · 1979

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2006

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

1001979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 11 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970)

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Arizona v. California · United States v. Annunziato · Beatty v. Lycoming County Children's Services · Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “29 U.S.C. § 660 (c)(1) of the Act provides: No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this chapter or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition. A statement of the declarant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarant’s will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.