Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 F.2d 134 - Hoopes v. Equifax, Inc.

Hoopes v. Equifax, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

611 F.2d 134 · 1979

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
6
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Prewitt v. United States Postal Service (1981), Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education (1981)

37 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

59019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 793

Relies on Management Investors v. United Mine Workers · Kistner v. Califano · Bowdidge v. Lehman · Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if appellant is a handicapped person under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 793 , that statute provides for an administrative remedy through the Department of Labor and does not authorize a private cause of action in the courts. Hoopes v. Equifax, Inc., 611 F.2d 134, 135 (6th Cir.1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it is not reversible error for a district court to grant summary judgment before expiration of the ten day period if the non-moving party can demonstrate no prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a district court must comply with the ten days requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.