United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis
611 F.2d 531 · 1980
Citation profile
94 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Perez (2002), United States v. Martino (1981)
94 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 495 · 28 U.S.C. § 1732
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Sandstrom v. Montana · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Santoni v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and making all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury verdict ... the Government proved by a preponderance of the evidence”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] defendant's decision to present evidence in his behalf following denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal made at the conclusion of the Government’s evidence operates as a waiver of his objection to the denial of his motion. If a defendant fails to renew his motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of all the evidence, the "waiver doctrine” operates to foreclose the issue of sufficiency of the evidence on appeal absent a "manifest miscarriage of justice.” If a defendant renews his motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of all the evidence, the "waiver doctrine” requires the reviewing court to examine all the evidence rather than to restrict its examination to the evidence presented in the Government’s case-in-chief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by these rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.