Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 F.2d 61 - Strader v. Garrison

Strader v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis

611 F.2d 61 · 1979

Citation profile

136
cited by 136 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 136 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Hill v. Lockhart (1985), United States v. Kobrosky (1983)

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 21 states

64019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · McMann v. Richardson · Parker v. North Carolina · Marzullo v. Maryland · Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent Institution

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]hough parole eligibility dates are collateral consequences of the entry of a guilty plea of which a defendant need not be informed if he does not inquire, when he is grossly misinformed about it by his lawyer, and relies upon that misinformation, he is deprived of his constitutional right to counsel.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the misadvice of the lawyer is so gross as to amount to a denial of the constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, leading the defendant to enter an improvident plea, striking the sentence and permitting a withdrawal of the plea seems only a necessary consequence of the deprivation of the right to counsel. Deprivation of the constitutional right cannot be left unredressed.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “One would not suppose that the collateral consequence rule ... would apply in a situation in which defendant’s guilty plea was induced by actual misadvice respecting some collateral consequence when that consequence was of substantial importance to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.