United States v. Webster

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 21, 1980.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1980-01-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1980

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Webster

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-01-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles I. Poole, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

¶2Samuel J. Smargon, Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiffappellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4(Opinion November 14, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 606 F.2d 581).

¶5Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.