Toribio-Chavez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
611 F.3d 57 · 2010
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 6 U.S.C. § 291 · 6 U.S.C. § 542 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kungys v. United States · Ryan v. Royal Insurance Co. of America · Javier Bernal-Vallejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · KPS & Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc. · Yongo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the 'Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in [DHS] proceedings[,] . . . the less rigid constraints of due process impose outer limits based upon considerations of fairness and reliability.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Diaz Ortiz v. Barr“a 'due process claim cannot succeed without prejudice; without prejudice, any error that occurred would be harmless.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Diaz Ortiz v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.