Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 P.2d 536 - Thomas v. Bailey

Thomas v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2022

21 state decisions

9019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. · Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes · Wyatt v. Aderholt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “generally, full compensation at a reasonable rate per hour will prove adequate,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the sums at stake in the controversy are sufficiently large to prompt suit regardless of the public interest, an award of attorney’s fees against the losing party has been found reasonable. In such cases, the concern that fear or expense will significantly deter citizens from litigating questions of general interest to the community is inapplicable. Similarly, questions which primarily affect the private rights of the parties before the court lack the requisite public character to prohibit an award, even if some public or constitutional issues are involved.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “many of the same factors used as a guide in determining the fee an attorney should charge a client are applicable”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.