611 So. 2d 1159 - Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · 354 So. 2d 825 - Houston v. State · Williams v. State · Timmons v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is irrelevant that the testimony concerning the appellant's silence was not elicited by the prosecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Qualls v. State“[t]he jury heard the testimony, and no curative instruction was given to it”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Qualls v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.