Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 SO2D 1254 - Richardson v. Watson

Richardson v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2018

11 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc. · Doctor's Hosp. of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison · 537 So. 2d 96 - Johnson v. Citizens State Bank · 561 So. 2d 260 - Skinner v. Skinner · 419 So. 2d 1192 - Potucek v. Smeja

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unlike an authorized and timely motion directed to a final order, a motion for reconsideration or rehearing of a nonfinal order does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.