Hawthorne v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eaton v. City of Tulsa · Doherty v. National Casting Division, Midland-Ross Corp. · 350 So. 2d 723 - Carroll v. State · In Re Powers · George v. Toal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(i) Misconduct of any person that obstructs the administration of justice and that is committed either in the court’s presence or so near thereto as to interrupt, disturb, or hinder its proceedings, or “(ii) Willful disobedience or resistance of any person to a court’s lawful writ, subpoena, process, order, rule, or command, where the dominant purpose of the finding of contempt is to punish the contemnor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fowler v. Fowler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.