611 So. 2d 506 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Sloan v. Hicks · Ford v. Wainwright · Hagemann v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general rule is that ‘ “[e]xtrajudicial confessions are prima facie involuntary and inadmissible, and the burden is on the State to prove that the confession was made voluntarily.” ’ Ex parte Weeks, 531 So.2d 643, 644 (Ala.1988), quoting Ex parte Callahan, 471 So.2d 463, 464 (Aa.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 567 , 88 L.Ed.2d 552 (1985). ‘The trial court need only be convinced from a preponderance of the evidence to find a confession to have been voluntarily made.’ Jackson v. State, 562 So.2d 1373 (Aa.Cr.App.1990). See also Ex parte McCary, 528 So.2d 1133 (Aa.1988).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sparks v. State“The question of undue influence in obtaining admissions or confessions is determined by an examination of all attendant circumstances, with the inquiry focusing on whether the accused's free will and rational intellect were overborne at the time of his confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. AM v. State“The grounds for challenging a prospective juror for cause are set forth in § 12-16-150, Code of Alabama 1975 . Here, no specific statutory ground existed to strike this juror for cause, so an `absolute bias' on her part must have been shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.