Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 So. 2d 947 - Sneed v. Verdun

611 So. 2d 947 - Sneed v. Verdun’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co. · 501 So. 2d 377 - Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. Pittman · Sawyer v. Head, Dependents Of

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Intervention of Right. Upon timely application, anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) when a statute confers an unconditional right to intervene, or; (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The acceptance of compensation benefits from or the making of a claim for compensation against an employer ... shall not affect the right of the employee or his dependents to sue any other party at law for such injury or death, but the employer or his insurer shall be entitled to reasonable notice and opportunity to join in any such action or may intervene therein. If such employer or insurer join in such action, they shall be entitled to repayment of the amount paid by them as compensation and medical expenses from the net proceeds of such action (after deducting the reasonable costs of collection) as hereinafter provided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.