Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 SW2D 242 - State v. Puckett

State v. Puckett’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Koonce (1987), State v. O'DELL (1984)

42 state decisions

3301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Franco · State v. Morgan · State v. Chase · State v. Nichelson · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wjhether the trial court’s conduct is such as to prejudice the minds of the jury against defendant thereby depriving defendant of a fair and impartial trial. Whether there was prejudice depends on the context and words in each case. The trial court must maintain a position of absolute impartiality, avoid any conduct which might be construed as indicating a belief on the part of the judge as to the guilt of defendant and the court should not demonstrate hostility toward the defendant. (Citations omitted.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the mere presence of an accused at the scene of a crime will not sustain a conviction, presence may be considered along with other incriminating evidence to determine if the total circumstances raise a reasonable inference that the accused was a participant in the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The trial court’s remarks in this case did not indicate any attitude of hostility or bias against the defendant, or that the judge believed defendant was guilty of the crime charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.