Crowl v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Turner v. United States · Filmon v. Florida · Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · Gray v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Coca leaves and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of coca leaves, and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation thereof which is chemically equivalent or identical with any of these substances, but not including decocain-ized coca leaves or extractions which do not contain cocaine or ecgonine.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McDuff · Martinez v. State““knowingly and intentionally deliver a controlled substance, namely: cocaine, to [J. H.].’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Perez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.