Kottis v. Cerilli’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2019
1 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. Dial Media, Inc. · Jakober v. E. M. Loew's Capitol Theatre, Inc. · Rowell v. Kaplan · Smith v. Boyd · Elias v. Youngken
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Recovery of costs by prevailing party” provides: “In civil actions at law, the party prevailing shall recover costs, except where otherwise specially provided, or as justice may require, in the discretion of the court.” 6 . Section 9-22-1-8, entitled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is well established that 'a party who signs an instrument manifests his assent to it and cannot later complain that he did not read the instrument or that he did not understand its contents.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.