Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 F.2d 1055 - Dilda v. Quern

Dilda v. Quern’s Empirical Analysis

612 F.2d 1055 · 1980

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Kapps v. Wing (2005), Bennett v. White (1989)

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

2901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Vargas v. Trainor · Gloria Banks v. James L. Trainor, Etc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hough it states the ultimate reason for the reduction or cancellation of benefits, the notice fails to provide the recipient with a breakdown of income and allowable deductions”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “many of the mistakes that will inevitably be made will stand uncorrected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(quoting Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 268 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970))); Dilda, 612 F.2d at 1057 these calculations, plaintiffs have little protection against errors committed by the Department in determining the amount of their grants.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.