Nuno J. Docarmo, Etc. v. F.v. Pilgrim I. Corp..’s Empirical Analysis
612 F.2d 11 · 1979
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2018
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michigan Central Railroad v. Vreeland · Mobil Oil Corporation v. Higginbotham K · Turner v. Louisiana · Igneri v. CIE. de Transports Oceaniques · Ivy v. Security Barge Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The recovery ... shall be a fair and just compensation for the pecuniary loss sustained by the persons for whose benefit the suit is brought....”). 6 . Moragne explicitly left the determination of the proper beneficiaries in a maritime wrongful death suit to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the deceased seaman's survivors are limited to recovering damages of a pecuniary nature”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no error in the district court's ruling and jury instructions so limiting damages,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.