United States v. Clardy’s Empirical Analysis
612 F.2d 1139 · 1980
Citation profile
24 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Diggs (1981), United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp. (1983)
24 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Castor v. United States · Knetsch v. United States · Hearst v. United States · United States v. Hearst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this type of testimony is relevant to the issue of willfulness where the theory of the defense is that there is a good faith dispute as to the interpretation of the tax laws.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a question of law on which the judge should have instructed the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.