Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 F.2d 1226 - United States v. Stevens

United States v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

612 F.2d 1226 · 1979

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Phillips (1981), State v. Johnson (2008)

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

23019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pinkerton v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Russell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by a desire to change his life style and stay out of trouble.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Appellant’s argument that no overt act was charged in the travel act count does not impress us. Overt acts are alleged and were proved in connection with the conspiracy count. We do not think it is necessary to reallege overt acts with respect to the conspiracy in the travel act count, which fairly meets the standard set forth in Levine. See United States v. King, 521 F.2d 61 (10th Cir.1975); United States v. Levine, 457 F.2d at 1188 n. 1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[w]hen the same mental element is required for each act ... an initial recital of the element is sufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.