Dawson v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis
612 F.2d 1280 · 1980
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 181 (Coal Market Competition Act of 2000) · 30 U.S.C. § 226
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Morley Const Co v. Maryland Casualty Co · Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United States · Ballard E. Spencer Trust, Inc. v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.