Berdick v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
612 F.2d 533 · 1979
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States (1981), Minehan v. United States (2007)
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 26 U.S.C. § 7428 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1503 · 28 U.S.C. § 1506 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395J (§ 1831 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · United States v. King · United States Marcus v. Hess · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Castor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any claim upon or against the Government of the United States . . . knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.