Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 F.2d 594 - Currier v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Currier v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare’s Empirical Analysis

612 F.2d 594 · 1980

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2023
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 85 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Heckler v. Campbell (1983), Samuel C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee (1987)

20 federal appellate · 85 district ·

57019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Landess v. Weinberger · Miranda v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “itself seems on its face to be substantial.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unaccompanied by any formal opinion and diagnosis explaining to what degree and in what respect appellant may be impaired by his mental illness and relating these deficiencies to the requirements of his former job and other available jobs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.