Bartholomew Dc v. Virginia Chiropractors Association Inc American Chiropractic Association D Bartholomew Dc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
11 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 254 F. Supp. 2d 52 - Freeman v. Fallin (2003), 351 Pa. Super. 234 - Skinner v. Flymo, Inc. (1986)
11 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co · United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n · Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc. · Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co. · United States v. Scophony Corp. of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The practical everyday business or commercial concept of doing or carrying on business 'of any substantial character' [is] the test of venue”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Sec. 2(a) The business of insurance, and every person engaged therein, shall be subject to the laws of the several States which relate to the regulation or taxation of such business. (b) No Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance, or which imposes a fee or tax upon such business, unless such Act specifically related to the business of insurance: Provided, That after June 30, 1948, the Act of July 2, 1980, as amended, known as the Sherman Act, and the Act of October 15, 1914, as amended, known as the Clayton Act, and the Act of September 26, 1914, known as the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, shall be applicable to the business of insurance to the extent that such business is not regulated by State law.... Sec. 3(b) Nothing contained in this Act shall render the said Sherman Act inapplicable to any agreement to boycott, coerce, or intimidate, or act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1012 , 1013(b). Additionally, a joint Congressional Committee recently gave resounding support to the McCarran-Ferguson Act: “The conferences wish to indicate their strong reaffirmation of the basic policy of the McCarran-Ferguson Act: that the business of insurance is to be regulated by the states.” 126 Cong.Rec. H3149, 3157 (May 1, 1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Virginia accounted for only 53 of the 8875 national members, .06 per cent of its membership. ACA never qualified to do business in Virginia . . . and its sole office was in Iowa. In Virginia, there were no offices, no officers, no agents, no property, no purchases, no seminars or workshops, and no sales, save of pamphlets, journals, and other educational and public relations materials generating very little revenue. All transactions were by mail. No membership meetings were convened in Virginia; no directors or employees resided there.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.