Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 F.3d 1279 - Scott v. Roberts

Scott v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

612 F.3d 1279 · 2010

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 527

Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Elrod v. Burns · Texas v. United States · United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. · Davis v. Federal Election Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether there is a substantial likelihood that the party applying for preliminary relief will succeed later on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will suffer an irreparable injury absent preliminary relief; (B) whether the harm that the applicant will likely suffer outweighs any harm that its opponent will suffer as a result of an injunction; and (4) whether preliminary relief would disserve the public interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot be undone through monetary remedies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “repeatedly held that harms to speech rights “ ‘for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitute[ ] irreparable injury’” supporting preliminary relief. [Florida Businessmen for Free Enterprise v. City of Hollywood, 648 F.2d 956 ,] 958 [ (5th Cir.1981) ] (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 , 96 S.Ct. 2673, 2690 , 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976)); see also KH Outdoor, LLC v. City of Trussville, 458 F.3d 1261, 1271-72 (11th Cir.2006); Let’s Help Fla. v. McCrary, 621 F.2d 195 , 199 (5th Cir.1980). “The rationale behind these decisions [is] that chilled free speech ..., because of [its] intangible nature, could not be compensated for by monetary damages; in other words, plaintiffs could not be made whole.” [Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Association of General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville, Florida], 896 F.2d 1283, 1285 (11th Cir. 1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.