McGowan v. Hulick’s Empirical Analysis
612 F.3d 636 · 2010
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Farmer v. Brennan · Erickson v. Pardus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tihe length of delay that is tolerable depends on the seriousness of the condition and the ease of providing treatment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“non-life-threatening but painful conditions may constitute deliberate indifference if the delay exacerbated the injury or unnecessarily prolonged an inmate's pain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mitchell v. Kallas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.