Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 NE2D 604 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hardin v. State · Penley v. State · Rouster v. State · Bedgood v. State · United States v. Gruttadauro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desires may be inferred from evidence that the accused intentionally touched a child's genitals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “frequently grab[bed his three daughters'] breasts and buttocks over their clothes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “as if he found the touching and the girl's reactions amusing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.