State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Garrett v. United States · State v. Robinson · State v. Halliburton · State v. Pace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instruction No. 18 Under Count 1, the State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the First Degree. 1. On or about March 4th, 1999, the Defendant broke into and/or entered the home of [B.S.]. 2. The home was an occupied structure. 3. A person or persons were present in the occupied structure. 4. The Defendant did not have permission or authority to break into and/or enter the home. 5. The Defendant did so with the specific intent to commit a theft, assault, or robbery. 6. During the incident the Defendant intentionally or recklessly inflicted bodily injury on [B.S.]. Instruction No. 39 Under Count 2, the State must prove all of the following elements of Robbery in the Second Degree: 1. On or about March 4th, 1999, the Defendant had the specific intent to commit a -theft. 2. In carrying out his intention or to assist him in escaping from the scene, with or without the stolen property, the Defendant committed an assault on [B.S.]. - ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No person shall be convicted of a public offense which is necessarily included in another public offense of which the person is convicted. If the jury returns a verdict of guilty of more than one offense and such verdict conflicts with this section, the court shall enter judgment of guilty of the greater of the offenses only.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we compare the elements of the two offenses to determine whether it is possible to commit the greater offense without also committing the lesser offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.