State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · State v. Johnson · State v. Joon Kyu Kim · Bangert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state, the person may be punished for only one of the offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them. All the offenses, if prosecuted, shall be included in one prosecution which shall be stated in separate counts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“broaden[s] the protection afforded by our constitutional provisions against double jeopardy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“be twice put in jeopardy” of punishment for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V. Minn. Const. art, I, § 7. Similarly, under section 609.035, subdivision 1,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.