Sumdum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2003
15 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Matlock · Sedillo v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Stoner v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after the rental period has terminated, a guest's reasonable expectations of privacy are greatly diminished with respect to the right of [the] motel management to enter [the room.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State“[a] guest in a motel has a constitutionally protected right [of] privacy in [their] room”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State“motel personnel cannot consent to a search of the guest's room”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.