In Re BP’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matter of Montgomery · 92 N.C. App. 662 - Matter of Bishop · 158 N.C. App. 473 - In Re Weiler · In Re JLK · 142 N.C. App. 48 - McCallum v. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service of N.C. Carolina State University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from which she could prepare for future proceedings.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“failed to specify what motions should have been made and what evidence could have been, but was not, presented before the trial court”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“be reduced to writing, signed, and entered no later than 30 days following the completion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.