Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 SE2D 350 - In Re JDS

In Re JDS’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Montgomery · Matter of Ballard · Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · 140 N.C. App. 288 - In Re Huff · Matter of Huff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ubject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time by the parties or by the court ex mero motu .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exclusive original jurisdiction to hear and determine any petition or motion relating to termination of parental rights to any juvenile who resides in, is found in, or is in the legal or actual custody of a county department of social services or licensed child-placing agency in the district at the time of filing of the petition or motion”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The standard for review in termination of parental rights cases is whether the court's findings of fact are based upon clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether the findings support the conclusions of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.