In Re SDA’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 84 N.C. App. 666 - Harris v. Pembaur · 158 N.C. App. 441 - In Re McKinney · 138 N.C. App. 703 - Reece v. Forga · In Re Stumbo · 143 N.C. App. 688 - Haker-Volkening v. Haker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] court has inherent power to inquire into, and determine, whether it has jurisdiction and to dismiss an action ex mero motu when subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“exclusive jurisdiction over any case involving a juvenile who is alleged to be abused, neglected, or dependent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is axiomatic that a trial court must have subject matter jurisdiction over a case to act in that case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.