State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on 407 F. Supp. 451 - Turner v. American Bar Ass'n · 401 So. 2d 33 - Ex Parte Strickland · 440 So. 2d 1200 - Shabazz v. State · 459 F. Supp. 950 - International Molders & Allied Workers v. Buchanan Lumber Birmingham · Cady v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, a plaintiff bringing an action against the Board for negligent supervision would have at least a tenable argument that the Board was acting outside its jurisdiction in supervising pretrial detainees. Hence, potential liability for the Board is not absolutely precluded. [Emphasis supplied by D.A.R.]'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D.A.R. v. R.E.L. · D.A.R. v. R.E.L.“'Quasi-judicial immunity is not absolute, however, as illustrated by the following language in Carden v. Hand , 407 F.Supp. 451 , 482 (S.D. Ala. 1975), where the court stated:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D.A.R. v. R.E.L. · D.A.R. v. R.E.L.“`Quasi-judicial immunity is more limited than the immunity afforded to judges and extends only to those acts committed within the scope of the actor's jurisdiction and with the authorization of law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.