Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 So. 2d 1288 - Johnson v. State

612 So. 2d 1288 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Anthony Keith Johnson v. State of Alabama (2001), 666 So. 2d 91 - Brownlee v. State (1995)

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

180199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Engle v. Isaac · Jones v. Barnes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`. . . . "` . . . As for the appellant's statement to the police, the appellant's counsel could have discovered from the appellant himself the fact that the appellant had given a statement. Thus, the appellant could have obtained all of the evidence in question by exercising due diligence. "There is no Brady violation where the information in question could have been obtained by the defense through its own efforts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the prosecution suppressed evidence; (2) the evidence was favorable to the defendant; and (3) the evidence was material to the issues at trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.