Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 So. 2d 183 - State v. Wallace

612 So. 2d 183 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2018

22 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Doyle v. Ohio · Anderson v. Charles · 579 So. 2d 931 - Socorro v. City of New Orleans · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Officer Ñores, Officer Boehm told you that when [the defendant] came back to the jail he said, I shot that bastard and I’d shoot all of them if you gave me a chance. Your hands are tied, but mine are not. What bastards is he talking about? I asked him. Blacks. Same thing Jeff Boehm said. Now, if there were a legitimate self-defense issue, it didn’t come out in what he told the police at that time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “physical evidence and testimony associated with it, was irrelevant and prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.