Cartwright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 75 Tex. Crim. 461 - Hicks v. State · Simpson v. State · 160 Tex. Crim. 622 - Barnett v. State · Kirk v. State · 158 Tex. Crim. 344 - Cartwright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although there is a juror’s affidavit attached to the motion that was sworn to before a notary public other than her attorney, it need not be considered when it is not attached to nor incorporated in a properly verified motion. Martin v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 423 , 334 S.W.2d 796 (1960); Ferguson v. State [ 159 Tex.Cr.R. 169 , 261 S.W.2d 721 ] supra; Cartwright v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 344 , 255 S.W.2d 878 (1953); Burnett v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 477 , 165 S.W. 581 (1914).” Cartwright, 612 S.W.2d at 610 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bearden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.