International Detective Service, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
613 F.2d 1067 · 1979
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 1994 · most notably Citizens State Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1983), Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1983)
21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 293 · 49 U.S.C. § 10102 · 5 U.S.C. § 557 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Santoni v. United States · Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Televisioncorporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors · Brady v. Ohio · Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Calumet Harbor Terminals Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) to recognize and preserve the inherent advantage of each mode of transportation; (2) to promote safe, adequate, economical and efficient transportation; (3) to encourage sound economic conditions in transportation, including sound economic conditions among carriers; (4) to encourage the establishment and maintenance of reasonable rates for transportation without unreasonable discrimination or unfair or destructive competitive practices; (5) to cooperate with each State and the officials of each State on transportation matters; and (6) to encourage fair wages and working conditions in the transportation industry.” 49 U.S.C.A. §10101 (West 1979).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““neither it nor the Administrative Procedure Act requires a detailed analysis of each and an explicit weighing of each against the other. The Commission’s determination is adequate if logical processes in reaching that decision are reasonably discernible and the essential basic findings are revealed. * * * [the court] should uphold agency findings of ‘less than ideal clarity’ if satisfied from the determination that the administrators gave a ‘hard look’ at the relevant issues and if ‘the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned.’ ” 613 F.2d 1067 , 1077.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““* * * providing motor vehicle transportation for compensation under continuing agreements with a person or a limited number of persons—(A) by assigning motor vehicles for a continuing period of time for the exclusive use of each such person; or (B) designed to meet the distinct needs of each such person.” 49 U.S.C.A. §10102 (12) (West 1979).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.