Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 F.2d 1295 - United States v. Leach

United States v. Leach’s Empirical Analysis

613 F.2d 1295 · 1980

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2002 · most notably United States v. Arruda (1983), United States v. Alvarez (1980)

49 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

410198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Goldstein v. United States · Bruno v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the alleged conspirators: knew or should have known of the scope of the conspiracy; shared a common single goal; benefitted from each other's activities or participation; or, that the activities constituted a single unified scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To testify later in greater detail in response to detailed questions is not inconsistent, especially when the added detail was not crucial to the earlier conversation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'a failure to assert a fact, when it would have been natural to assert it, amounts in effect to an assertion of the non-existence of the fact....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.