Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 F.2d 779 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

613 F.2d 779 · 1980

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Clay (2012), United States v. Scafe (1987)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon · Hawkins v. United States · Simpson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Statement of Defendant.—Upon request of a defendant the state shall permit the defendant to inspect and copy or photograph: any relevant written or recorded statements made by the defendant, or copies thereof, within the possession, custody or control of the state, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known, to the district attorney general; the substance of any oral statement which the state intends to offer in evidence at the trial made by the defendant whether before or after arrest in response to interrogations by any person then known to the defendant to be a law-enforcement officer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.