Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 F.2d 809 - In re Sherwood

In re Sherwood’s Empirical Analysis

613 F.2d 809 · 1980

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
May 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2013 · most notably Diamond v. Diehr (1981), Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. (1986)

3 federal appellate · 7 district ·

3301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 100 · 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Gottschalk v. Benson · Parker v. Flook · Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America · In re Gay · In re Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only evidence of concealment (accidental or intentional) is to be considered,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “) and the information that is desired (the”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is to restrain inventors from applying for patents while at the same time concealing from the public preferred embodiments of their inventions which they have in fact conceived.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.