Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 F.2d 819 - In re Koller

In re Koller’s Empirical Analysis

613 F.2d 819 · 1980

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
October 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2017

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 120

Relies on In re Prater · In re Hogan · In re Prater · Application of Joseph D. Fisher · In re Marzocchi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]riginal claims constitute their own description.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “might include water-immiscible solvents is not sufficient indication to one of ordinary skill at that time that such medium was part of appellants' invention. On the contrary, a fair reading of the grandparent disclosure would have led one to conclude that the isomerization in water and water-miscible media was appellants' contribution. Accordingly, it is our view that appellants are not entitled to the benefit of their grandparent application.... 24 Id. at 823, 204 USPQ at 705 (citation omitted). 25 Our predecessor court reversed, citing the general rule that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]ertainly, the disclosure of specifics adds to the understanding one skilled in the art would glean from a generic term, but it does not follow that such added disclosure limits the meaning thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.