Pace v. CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
613 F.3d 1066 · 2010
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10501
Relies on English v. General Electric Co. · Crosby Secretary of Administration and Finance of Massachusetts v. National Foreign Trade Council · Skop v. City of Atlanta · Cliff v. Payco General American Credits, Inc. · United States v. Roberson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o permit monetary liability to accrue under a state law nuisance claim where that liability is based on decisions the ICCTA purposefully freed from outside regulation would contradict the language and purpose of the ICCTA. The ICCTA expressly preempts state remedies involving the operation of the side track. Therefore, we will not permit landowners to circumvent that Congressional decision through state law nuisance claims.”); Rushing v. Ks. City S. Ry. Co., 194 F.Supp.2d 493 , 499 (S.D. Miss. 2001) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the operation of the side track caused an increase in noise and smoke due to the traffic on the track[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.