Butte County v. Hogen’s Empirical Analysis
613 F.3d 190 · 2010
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 26 district ·
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2719 (§ 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 465 · 25 U.S.C. § 476 · 25 U.S.C. § 479A (Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the agency must explain why it decided to act as it did.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Consequently, when assessing whether agency action is arbitrary or capricious, in their application to the requirement of factual support[,] the substantial evidence test and the arbitrary or capricious test are one and the same.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]n agency's refusal to consider evidence bearing on the issue before it constitutes arbitrary agency action within the meaning of § 706.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.