United States v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
613 F.3d 249 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Griffin v. California · Jones v. Barnes · United States v. Santos · United States v. Brandon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“being wholly owned by federally insured Guaranty Bank, a loss to GRL would constitute a loss to Guaranty Bank.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“conviction because 'the government failed to prove the elements of conspiracy to commit money laundering' given that 'the alleged money laundering activity was part and parcel of the underlying [specified unlawful activity].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was charged in the indictment with, and found guilty by the jury of, conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 (a)(1)(A)(i) and 1956(h).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.