Witten v. Pitman’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 7 · 31 U.S.C. § 1101 (Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010) · 31 U.S.C. § 1102 · 31 U.S.C. § 5316 · 31 U.S.C. § 5317
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Almeida-Sanchez v. United States · United States v. Ramsey · United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reserved or acquired for the use of the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.