Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 613 N.E.2d 53 - Ewing v. State

Ewing v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · United States v. Ventresca · Maryland v. Garrison · Steele v. United States No. 1 · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such period because of congestion of the court calendar.... Any defendant so held shall, on motion, be discharged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.