Habig v. Bruning’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker (2000), Frey v. Bank One (1996)
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oelling v. Rao · Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc. · Wehling v. Citizens National Bank · Burks v. Rushmore · Pickett v. Pickett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'knew or in the exercise of ordinary diligence could have discovered that an injury had been sustained as a result of the tortious conduct of another.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“and the applicable statutes of limitations begin to run when the injured party knows or, in the exercise of ordinary diligence, could have known, that he or she had sustained an injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The following actions must be commenced within six (6) years after the cause of action accrues: ⅝ ⅝ ⅝ ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ (3) Actions for injuries to property other than personal property!.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.